Appendix I: Politics in the Anthropocene

AZ-6 Precincts in Pima County

First pass at analyzing with 

Particular Attention to Ones Where Fewer than

50% of the Eligible Voters Participated

Precinct Number	Turnout	Ciscomani Votes	Engel Votes	Registered & didn’t vote (approx.)	Yes on Prop 309	No on Prop 309	Comments
114	20%	154	125	1,350	143	129	Looks like the worst performing precinct in Pima County. These people need help!
253	38%	32	79	270
150	39%	152	181	500	149	168
54	39%	407	740	1,800			Almost 2:1 for Engel in this poorly performing district. Worthy of a lot of attention
72	43%	504	1552	2,800			Poorly performing district. Lots of Sound Democracy votes not cast
123	44%	972	1,352	3,000			A very poor performing precinct with lots of sound democracy votes not cast
67	45%	380	1,180	2,000			Poorly performing district. Lots of Sound Democracy votes not cast
266	45%	74	24	120	65	35
57	46%	511	1,553	2,550			A poor performing precinct that went strongly for Engel. Lots of left out votes. Good focus
87	46%	98	267	450			A solid sound democracy precinct where there could have been a significantly higher turnout. Not a lot of votes, but the ones that are there are Sound Democracy. Prop 309 defeated by 2:1
91	50%	487	1,331	1,900			Lots of Sound Democracy voters didn't show up
116	50%	1,483	1,995	3,600			Lots of sound Democracy voters didn't show up
129	50%	518	712	1,300			Relatively poor performing precinct. More votes would have likely trended toward sound democracy outcomes
58	52%	125	487	550			Not a huge number of votes, but any additional are likely to vote sound democracy
124	52%	444	518	900	421	508	Contested precinct. Lots of votes not cast
75	54%	363	1,609	1,600			Strongly for Engel. Lots of Sound Democracy votes that didn't get cast.
40	55%	948	913	1,500	873	932	Hotly contested. More sound democracy votes are to be found there.
107	55%	640	1,441	1,750			Lots of Sound Democracy voters didn't show up
15	56%	513	457	850	467	456	A slightly smaller percentage of Ciscomani voters voted for prop 309 than Engel voters who voted against it. A hotly contested precinct worthy of investing energy
90	56%	550	481	815			More Sound Democracy votes are out there
100	56%	544	1,201	1,400			Lots of Sound Democracy voters didn't show up
55	57%	314	595	700			Strongly for Engel. More sound democracy votes here.
94	57%	280	1,149	1,100			Lots of Sound Democracy voters didn't show up
6	58%	1,639	1,221	2,000	1,512	1,234	More votes would probably mean more for rightist thinking
24	58%						Strongly for Ciscomani; Not a reason to focus attention on this precinct
30	58%	821	1,295	1,550			Strong turnout for Engel; worthy of some attention
81	58%	400	347	550	361	358	The 3 vote spread between pro and con Prop 309 indicates that there are more Sound Democracy votes to be had
85	58%	230	457	500			A solid sound democracy district where there could have been a higher turnout
95	58%	491	411	650	468	419	Hotly contested precinct
108	58%	844	1,900	2,000			Lots of votes and lots of sound democracy voters didn't show up
49	59%	598	513	800	591	496	Hotly contested. Sound democracy voters can be found here
79	59%	1,183	944	1,500	1,102	956	Closely contested. Not clear what the result would look like if more people voted.
89	59%	554	1,460				More Sound Democracy votes are out there in this energized precinct
69	60%	1,191	1,771	1,900			Decent odds that additional voters will be for Strong Democracy
13	61%	957	1,107	1,400	875	1,108	Virtually ALL Engel voters said no to Prop 309. His turnout would mean more sound democracy.
14	61%	1,309	1,247	1,700	1,229	1,210	An extremely hotly contested precinct.
93	62%	372	1,174	950			Higher turnout would have meant more sound democracy voters
9	63%	766	1,117	1,100	724	1,100	More votes would probably have come from people like minded to us
109	63%	2,664	1,850				Not clear that more votes would've been so democracy voters
128	63%	722	892	950			More votes would have probably meant more votes for sound democracy
12	67%	1,818	1,984	900	1,737	1,832	More votes would have meant more votes for sound democracy
39	68%	1,375	1,189	1,200	1,233	1,267	Hotly contested. No on Prop 309 did better than Engel. Sound democracy votes are there.
103	68%	224	685	420			Higher turnout would have meant more sound democracy voters
104	68%	1,467	1,563	1,450	1,347	1,557	Hotly contested precinct. People here would likely be good informants
118	68%	823	1,319	1,150
115	70%	1,885	1,767	1,600	1,790	1,717	Hotly contested
126	70%	613	595	540	550	617	Hotly contested. Not a lot of votes. Why did "No" on Prop 309 run ahead of Engel?
88	71%	895	1,388	930			A solid Sound Democracy precinct.
99	71%	490	1,252	500			More Sound Democracy people could have showed up
112	74%	953	1,400	850			More voters would like be sound democracy types
29	75%						Strong turnout for Engel; worthy of some attention
35	75%						Not a lot of votes here, but hotly contested. My hunch is that these are well informed voters with some strong influencers living in this precinct
77	75%	1,098	968	700	1,014	974	Hotly contested. Went for Ciscomani. The fact that the precinct was a "Yes" for 309 means that some of the votes not cast would have gone for voter suppression/not Sound Democracy
125	75%	687	1,122				Not a lot of votes, but the ones there are trending toward sound democracy
46	76%						Strong, for Ciscomani. Unlikely to turn out more sound democracy voters.
56	76%	628	1,328	620			Strongly for Engel. More sound democracy votes here.
61	76%	633	998	500			Strongly for Engel. 2:1 odds that every additional voter will be sound democracy
106	77%	518	639	350			The people in this precinct take voting seriously!
84	78%	2,895	2,709	1,550	2,771	2,624	Hotly contested precinct
121	78%	308	394	200			Not a lot of voters, but they are definitely engaged
127	79%	2,642	2,153	1,300	2,422	2,221	Lots of engaged voters. If more of them voted, they might well have not been strong democracy types.
74	81%	896	1,029	450			81% is a very high turnout level. Quite possible that there are influencers here. Sound democracy in the majority